A Stunning Video
For anyone interested in publishing and promoting book, the John Kremer website and blog are essential reading.
John has just published this extraordinary video, and I thought that I would pass it on.
RP On The Radio… Again… and Again
I am pleased be able to let you know that starting this week I am going to be doing a regular slot on Donna Seebo’s show on www.bbsradio.com.
We are going to be doing regular updates on Integrated Medicine and the science that underpins it.
I shall let you know when the shows are on, and I shall be attaching the broadcasts to my website.
Here is a little piece that I just recorded for the station.
Bonnie D. Graham on WGBB Tonite
I have the privilege of being on Bonnie D. Graham on WGBB Tonite:
LISTEN LIVE TODAY 6PM-EST: www.am1240wgbb,com
Up Close & Personal with Bonnie D. Graham on WGBB Tonite – Featured guests:
6 PM: Richard Petty, MD, “Healing, Meaning and Purpose–The Magical Power of the Emerging Laws of Life” on journaling, integrated medicine, healthy aging & more. www.RichardGPettyMD.com
The second guest is:
6:30 PM: Masha Malka, “The One Minute Coach– Change Your Life One Minute At A Time” believes we are all potential geniuses capable of achieving success in all areas of life. www.MashaMalka.com
I have just reviewed Masha’s most recent book on the Amazon website.
LISTEN to PODCASTS Anytime: www.BonnieRadioPodcasts.com
Digital media services: www.QBProductions.com
See you on the radio!…/bonnie
I shall let everyone know once we have the Podcasts prepared.
National Acupuncture Detoxification Association
I had the pleasure and privilege of being on Scott Cluthe’s show on Lime Radio this evening. It’s on Sirius Satellite Channel 114, and if you are interested in the new holistic worldview that is emerging all over the planet, I highly recommend Scott’s show and, in fact, all the shows that I have heard on Lime. I have also had a link to Lime website for some time now, and it always has a great deal of excellent material.
There were some excellent questions from listeners, and one caused me to do some research. The question was about the National Acupuncture Detoxification Association (NADA). The Association is a nonprofit that conducts training and provides public education about the use of acupuncture as an adjunctive treatment for addictions and mental disorders.
There is a substantial body of research literature on the topic of using acupuncture as part of a package of measures for treating substance abuse, and although it is still considered controversial in some quarters, it is being used in over 1,500 places around the world, and that does not include China and Japan, where I have seen acupuncture used a great deal in addictive disorders.
My own experience has been mixed. I have had little success I treating smoking addiction with acupuncture, though I have many colleagues who say that it is extremely helpful. I have had more success in using thought field therapy and homeopathy for treating smoking addiction, even though there is so far no good research data on the use of either for smoking.
If you are interested in the use of acupuncture as an adjunctive treatment for substance abuse, the NADA website if a good place to start.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute Joins the Open Access Revolution
The Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) has agreed to support Springer’s Open Choice program. What that means is that if articles are accepted for publication after a process of rigorous peer-review, they will immediately be published with full open access and deposited in repositories such as PubMed Central, at a flat-rate fee per article of $3,000. Springer’s Open Choice program applies to all its journals.
HHMI has a strong commitment to ensuring public access to original research articles. Beginning with papers submitted for publication after January 1, 2008, HHMI will require its scientists to publish their original research articles in journals that allow the articles and supplementary materials to be made freely accessible in a public repository within six months of publication.
HHMI is the largest private funder of biomedical research in the United States and commits more than $500 million a year for research and distributes $80 million in grant support for science education.
HHMI investigators already publish a significant number of research articles in open access journals or in journals with open access options. Under the new policy, HHMI will pay up to $2,000 in open access charges per article with the balance coming from laboratory budgets or other sources.
It is wonderful that one of the largest and most prestigious research institutes in the world, is actively supporting open-access publishing and backing up their words with significant funding
New Treatment Options: Knowing What to Use
One of the main reasons that I created this blog is that I want to empower you: I want to give to give you the information that you need to care for yourself and the people around you.
One of the problems with many new treatments is that they promise the earth, sometimes drag people away from things that may help them and then fail to deliver.
This is something that I struggled with in the field of holistic medicine for thirty years. I constantly hear and see fantastic claims that cannot be right and are often based on a complete misunderstanding of how the body functions. On the other hand there are some highly unorthodox methods and techniques that can be amazingly helpful. My job has been to find out which is which!
But it is not only in the field of unorthodox medicine. I have recently heard about something very questionable in the field of psychotherapy. Somebody has invented a new form of therapy that cuts across and ignores decades of research. He is now offering certifications in his method. So long as you have a very basic healthcare qualification, you pay him a few hundred dollars, do an online training and then you can set up shop as a therapist. Many members of the public do not know how little regulation there is for some of these therapies.
Here are some guidelines for checking out a new therapy or remedy:
1. Efficacy
Be suspicious of any treatment or therapist if they:
- Claim that a treatment works for everyone: I have yet to find ANY treatment that works for everyone
- Only use case histories or testimonials as proof. The plural of anecdote id not evidence. If we see or hear about something that looks promising, it is essential to confirm the reports with systematic, independent controlled research. Be aware that if that has not been done, the person selling you the treatment or the therapist claiming to help is essentially experimenting on you. And if they want to experiment they need your consent and the approval of an Institutional Review Board. And don’t buy into the “my work is so brilliant and cutting edge that nobody will publish it in a journal.” It is hard to publish really new work, but we cannot believe what people are saying until it has been subjected to peer review: other experts go through the work with a fine toothcomb to see if it is right.
- Cite only one study as proof. Hundreds of promising studies have turned out to be dead ends when someone else tried to repeat it. You can be a lot more confident if several studies have shown the same thing.
- Cites a study that did not have a control (comparison) group. That is always a first step in evaluating a new treatment.
- Cite a study that you cannot see yourself. We spend a lot of time checking some of the claims made on infomercials and websites. They often talk about some obscure study in a hard-to-find journal written in a foreign language. We go and find the papers and if necessary translate them. We constantly find that the studies quoted contain results that are 180 degrees away from what they claim.
- Only reference themselves. This recently came to light with a form of therapy that comes with a short book. There was not one scientific citation, but loads of self-references, so it looked as if there was something credible behind it.
- Testing a treatment without a control group is a necessary first step in investigating a new treatment, but subsequent studies with appropriate control groups are needed to clearly establish the effectiveness of the intervention.
2. Safety?
Be wary if:
- A therapist or someone promoting a remedy cannot tell you the exact consequences of not following up with some other treatment. Safety is not only about the safety of a product or a therapy: it is also about the risks of declining a proven treatment
- A therapist tells you stop any other treatment that you are on without discussing the risks of stopping it, and without discussing the situation with any previous therapist. It does not matter whether you were on a medication or having acupuncture. Different treatments interact, and stopping and starting can be risky. If a therapist who does not prescribe medications tells you stop them, be very, very careful. There are precise ways to discontinue most treatments
- A remedy comes without precise directions about how to use it
- Something does not list its contents or ingredients
- A product has no information or warnings about side effects
- If a product or therapeutic approach is described as natural, with the implication that natural means safe. Hurricanes, arsenic and deadly nightshade are all natural!
3. Promotion
Be very cautious if a therapy or treatment:
- Claims to be based on a secret formula or a secret that has been deliberately hidden from you
- Claims that the particular treatment or therapy is being suppressed or unfairly attacked by the medical or therapeutic communities
- Claims to work immediately and permanently for everyone
- Is described as an “Amazing breakthrough” or a “Miracle.”
- Claims to be a cure for something that other experts believe is incurable. They could be right, but then we have to go back to the first point about efficacy
- Is only promoted through infomercials, self-promoting books, online or by mail order
4. Evaluating Media Reports
- When evaluating reports of health care options, consider the following questions:
- What is the source of the information? Good sources of information include medical schools, government agencies (such as the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Mental Health), professional medical associations, and national disorder/disease-specific organizations. Information from studies in reputable, peer-reviewed medical journals is more credible than popular media reports.
- Who is the authority? The affiliations and relevant credentials of “experts” should be provided, though initials behind a name do not always mean that the person is an authority. Reputable medical journals now require researchers to reveal possible conflicts of interest, such as when a researcher conducting a study also owns a company marketing the treatment being studied or has any other potential conflict of interest.
- Who funded the research? It may be important to also know who funded a particular research project.
- Is the finding preliminary or confirmed? Unfortunately, a preliminary finding is often reported in the media as a “breakthrough” result. An “interesting preliminary finding” is a more realistic appraisal of what often appears in headlines as an “exciting new breakthrough.” You should track results over time and seek out the original source, such as a professional scientific publication, to get a fuller understanding of the research findings
5. What Are the Financial Implications of This New Therapy or Remedy?
- Is the treatment covered by health insurance?
- What out-of-pocket financial obligation will you or your family have?
- How long will this out-of-pocket financial obligation be?
- Is there any kind of guarantee?
Tips for Finding Reliable Information Online
The good news is that the Internet is becoming an excellent source of medical information. The bad news is that with its low cost and global entry, the Web is also home to a great deal of unreliable health information.
In addition to the tips cited earlier, Web surfing really needs some special considerations:
Know the source. The domain name tells you the source of information on the Web site, and the last part of the domain name tells you about the source. For example:
.edu = university/educational
.biz/.com = company/commercial
.org = non-profit organization
.gov = government agency
The same rules do not always apply if you are looking at websites in other countries.
Obtain a “second opinion” regarding information on the Web. Pick a key phrase or name and run it through a search engine to find other discussions of the topic or talk to your health care professional.
Experts who spend time and trouble evaluating reports and then publish their findings online will often answer questions. RichardGPettyMD.blogs.com is one that does, and there are many others.
The Accelerating Open Access Revolution
It is only a couple of days since I last wrote something on the revolution in open access to information, but here are two new things that I need to share with you.
First, today saw the launch of the journal Open Medicine.
These are a couple of extracts from James Maskalyk’s editorial in the inaugural issue:
…To attain their true worth, medical journals need to place the knowledge on their pages into as many capable hands as possible. In the past, this opportunity was limited mainly to those with a university library close by. Now, because of the Internet, one simply needs to be near a telephone line. The capacity of medical journals to disseminate knowledge has never been greater…
Unfortunately, physicians attempting to answer a clinical question are faced with two unappealing options: to navigate a sea of unedited pages of varying quality, or to pay for access to more carefully reviewed scholarly information. It seems an anathema to the spirit of medical research that, largely for economic reasons, the information it produces remains hidden from many potential users. Access is limited not only for health professionals in poorer countries, but also for health care providers in wealthy countries (most of whom do not have "free" access to information unless they work in universities), and for patients, who deserve the opportunity to become informed about research that affects their lives. The transformation of research findings and discussion of the results — the application of knowledge — is curtailed. Just as importantly, the debate over its merit is stifled before it can properly begin….
Medical knowledge should be public and free from undeclared influence. When possible, it should be free for those who apply it. Since people’s lives depend on it, that knowledge must be filtered several times before it is ready to use. Studies need to be peer reviewed, to have their statistics analyzed, their content edited, then copy edited, then published quickly for as wide an audience as possible. The prospect of having a high-quality source of information that held true to these principles but was also free and globally accessible was impossible to imagine 20 years ago….
The second thing is something very helpful on Peter Suber’s excellent blog:
OA podcasts from non-OA journals
Charles W. Bailey Jr. has collected some links for journals offering OA podcasts.
In
a recent SSP-L message, Mark Johnson, Journal Manager of HighWire
Press, identified three journals that offer podcasts or digital audio
files:Here are a few others:
The Delayed Leopard
Like most lovers of all things Apple, I’ve been greatly disappointed by the delay the release of the new Macintosh operating system, a.k.a. Mac OS 10.5 or Leopard.
It seems that we are going to have wait until October. Though we do have the iPhone to look forward to. ☺
After all the conspiracy theorists had finished saying their piece, there were some really rather funny takes on why the delay.
Have a look here:
Biomedical Journals and Open Access
I have written before about my enormous admiration for the global attempt to make research freely available to everyone. This is such an important step toward patient empowerment and greater transparency in science and medicine.
There is currently an online petition to support free and open access to European research, and if you also believe in the principles of integrity, transparency and personal empowerment, you may want to consider signing.
I was gratified to see how many major journals are now making articles immediately and permanently available online
without charge. A number of journals require an institutional or a
personal subscription to view other content, such as reviews or paper
reports. Free trial subsciptions to these journals are available.
This seems to be the most up-to-date listing, and everyone involved really deserves our gratitude. I shall continue to update this list as more journals become involved.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P X Y Z |
||
|
Information Overload
The British Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) has funded some very important research that confirms something that many of us have feared for quite a while: there is now so much information online that important science websites are in danger of becoming buried in a sheer avalanche of facts. Key science sites are failing to register in the top 30 Google search results.
Dr Ralph Schroeder, Dr Alexandre Caldas, Professor William Dutton, and Dr. Jenny Fry of the Oxford Internet Institute have investigated how the Internet is changing the way in which people seek out sources of scientific expertise.
Traditionally publishers have held a central position because of the importance of academic articles, but this is changing with increasing uses of the Internet and Web.
The study focused on how academic researchers in particular interact with the Web on topics including HIV/AIDS, climate change, terrorism, the Internet and society. These subjects are, of course, all highly topical, but the findings of this study will apply much more widely to the uses of the Internet and Web for searching for information on a variety of topics.
The research also confirmed something that clinicians have known for some time: the Web is far from being a neutral source of information. It has a particular structure that steers the search in directions that may not be intended by the user and so makes some sites more accessible than others. Search engines such as Google play an increasingly important gate-keeping role that will influence the information that is found. They can shape “winners and losers” by means that are not always apparent and moreover do so in a manner which can vary according to subject matter.
There is also a problem that some vested interests are able to “buy” high visibility. Many people with psychological difficulties have stumbled on Scientology websites without realizing it. And there are some people who have the time and the energy to attract a lot of “hits.”
The researchers came to several conclusions:
* The “visibility” of information on the Web is of increasing importance. Do people looking for research results on climate change or terrorism find themselves directed to a few top sites rather than a wide array of diverse sources? Do they encounter the most highly regarded researchers rather than marginal ones?
* Interviews revealed that researchers’ ideas of key networks, structures and organisations may not be mirrored by search engines. For example the HIV/AIDS researchers reported using national journals, charity organisations, statistics and public sector organisations but none of these appear in the top 30 search results for generic domain keywords. In addition, a number of institutions, people and other key organisations and resources failed to appear in the top 30 search results.
* The role search engines play can vary according to topic. In the HIV/AIDS and the Internet and society domains, for instance, search engines such as Google was mainly used as an aide memoire for locating known sources. For researchers on terrorism, the search engine played a more central role in exploring the object of research and identifying relevant sites of information.
“This will be an issue not just for policymakers,” Dr. Schroeder says, “but for educators, organisations involved in science and research communication, regulators responsible for access to the Web, and citizens who are concerned with the diversity and richness of the information world around them.”